« Immigration on the agenda as Mexico's president-elect visits White House | Main | White House defends Obama's trip to Pennsylvania »

November 27, 2012

Have Susan Rice's critics developed an "obsession?"

The White House stuck up for embattled UN Ambassador Susan Rice Tuesday as members of Congress continued to say they've got questions about her TV appearance after the consulate attack in Libya.

Press Secretary Jay Carney suggested Rice's critics had developed an "obsession'" that he called "misplaced." He said that some have "focused on this for what appear to be political reasons when the issue that matters is what happened to those four Americans and who was responsible and what can we do to make sure it doesn't happen again."

Carney questioned the focus on Rice's appearance, saying it could have been him on the shows that day. "We all relied on information from the intelligence community, which the intelligence community has made clear was based on initial assessments."

He added, "the focus on a Sunday show appearance is entirely misplaced, and it represents less interest I think in what happened in Benghazi, than in political dynamics in Washington."

He said that Rice was chosen to appear on the shows -- which he said have a "vaunted status in Washington" but nothing to do with Benghazi. -- because she's a "principal on the president's foreign policy team."
Carney said her remarks on the shows were "based on the best assessments of our intelligence community at the time" and "included caveats that those assessments would evolve as more information was collected."
He wouldn't comment on whether Rice is being considered for outgoing Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's job, but repeated Obama's remarks at a recent press conference that she's "enormously qualified for the position she holds and for a variety of positions in the foreign policy field if the president were to decide to nominate her for another position."


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Have Susan Rice's critics developed an "obsession?":


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


Typical groupthink persuasion technique. Don't answer the essential questions of the matter (why is our ambassador dead and why was Rice out peddling known falsehoods about the situation) paint those asking the questions as mean spirited or vindictive to distract from the main questions.

Sally J

I suppose you could call it an obsession - an obsession for the truth.

Which is necessary since the Obama administration seems to often be truth-challenged. You would think that the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help me God, would have come out earlier than 11 weeks after the Benghazi terrorist attack on 9/11 where 4 Americans were murdered.

The comments to this entry are closed.


"Planet Washington" covers politics and government. It is written by journalists in McClatchy's Washington Bureau.

Send a story suggestion or news tip.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31