« Obama camp rips Romney auto ad | Main | As economy lags, Obama, Romney tout backing of business leaders »

November 01, 2012

NYC's Bloomberg endorses Obama

Climate change roared back into presidential campaign Thursday, as New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, whose city remains partially underwater and crippled by Hurricane Sandy, endorsed President Barack Obama.

In his endorsement, which appeared as an op-ed in the publication he founded, Bloomberg said Obama's position on climate change in particular had moved him to endorse the president. He also cited the president's position on abortion and marriage equality.

But Bloomberg focused mostly on global warming, and said that he believes Obama sees climate change "as an urgent problem that threatens our planet," Bloomberg said. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney does not, he said.

"The devastation that Hurricane Sandy brought to New York City and much of the Northeast -- in lost lives, lost homes and lost business -- brought the stakes of Tuesday’s presidential election into sharp relief," Bloomberg said.

The mayor is one of the leaders of the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, a partnership of the world’s largest cities that have decided to take action on climate change in the absence of movement by federal governments.

Obama welcomed the Bloomberg endorsement, saying he was honored by it and that New Yorkers had his commitment that the country would "stand by New York in its time of need." The Romney campaign did not provide a response.

"I deeply respect him for his leadership in business, philanthropy and government, and appreciate the extraordinary job he's doing right now, leading New York City through these difficult days," Obama said. "While we may not agree on every issue, Mayor Bloomberg and I agree on the most important issues of our time -- that the key to a strong economy is investing in the skills and education of our people, that immigration reform is essential to an open and dynamic democracy, and that climate change is a threat to our children's future, and we owe it to them to do something about it."

Earlier this week, Bloomberg said that even if the direct cause of Sandy's severity was unknown, cities must recognize that something has changed and they'll be forced to grapple with it. "What is clear is that the storms that we've experienced in the last year or so around this country and around the world are much more severe than before," Bloomberg said Tuesday, during a press conference about storm recovery. "Whether that's global warming or what, I don't know. But we'll have to address those issues."

Bloomberg said in his op-ed that he might have been able to support what he described as "the 1994 or 2003 version" of Romney, "because like so many other independents, I have found the past four years to be, in a word, disappointing." As Massachusetts governor, Romney backed a regional cap-and-trade program, Bloomberg said, but has since "reversed course, abandoning the very cap-and-trade program he once supported."

Romney in the past "has also taken sensible positions on immigration, illegal guns, abortion rights and health care," Bloomberg wrote. "But he has reversed course on all of them, and is even running against the health-care model he signed into law in Massachusetts."

Romney has said previously that he believes climate change is occurring and that human activity is a contributing factor. During the Republican primary season, though, he said he didn't believe it was the right course to spend "trillions and trillions" to reduce carbon emissions. More recently, he said in a questionnaire submitted to Science Debate, a non-profit organization focusing on science issues in the presidential campaign, that he believes human activity contributes to global warming and that policymakers should consider the risk of negative consequences.

Climate change became a toxic political issue after a cap-and-trade bill collapsed in Congress in 2010, and it saw little discussion on the campaign trail.

For the first time since the topic surfaced in a presidential race in 1988, nominees made no mention of climate change during the prime-time television debates this year between the presidential contenders themselves or their running mates. Debate moderators also chose not to ask Obama or Romney about the issue, despite a clamor by climate activists and some not-so-gentle prodding on the part of pundits and scientists.

The silence on the issue became so deafening this election year that some activists dubbed it "climate silence." And until late in the campaign, some environmentalists struggled to summon enthusiasm for the Democratic president's re-election campaign until Obama's assertion that "climate change is not a hoax" brought delegates to their feet at the Democratic National Convention.

But the Obama administration has moved more quietly on some fronts to reduce carbon emissions, including boosting fuel-efficiency standards for automobiles and adopting tighter controls on mercury emissions from power plants. Bloomberg cited both in his op-ed.

Scientists aren't certain whether climate change, including record low levels of sea ice in the Arctic this summer, influenced Hurricane Sandy's path and intensity. They do know, however, that rising sea levels caused primarily by global warming worsened the storm surge and will continue to do so in future such weather events.

Environmentally minded political strategists have been trying to urge the Obama campaign that talking about climate change can be a winning issue on the campaign trail. Betsy Taylor, a political strategist who works with environmentalists, teaches candidates and advocates to talk about putting American ingenuity to use to address global warming, rather than focusing on science. She also urges them to focus on the impacts of extreme weather. In that context, people see climate change as their problem, not a faraway global one.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference NYC's Bloomberg endorses Obama:


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Thomas Nass

I would aver that nothing will prove more precisely the old Maxim: "What goes around, comes around", than the fact that what, we have, allowed to be Sprayed on our Crops, Spilled onto our Land -including the Pesticide run-off from crops, Spewed into our Air, Buried in our Soil, Dumped into our Waters, Left in our sub-surface as a result of mining and drilling(FRACKING) operations, will soon be seen, smelt and tasted, in that order, as it comes back at us out of our spigots.
Count on it!
The potential for the survival of our environment is directly proportional to the, insatiable, sociopathic GREED of the "Special Interests" and their carte blanche to continue to Pollute, Deceive the Public and, then, Pollute some more! If not brought under control, GREED will soon take this great Country Down!
We are our Environment’s Keeper!
If not us, WHO? Certainly not those who are PROFITING FROM ITS DESTRUCTION!Tom Nass
5th Marine Division - WWII


Geez,what a surprise, never would have though ol wonderful mike would endorse his friend> Give us a break, all corrupt cronies stick together.

The comments to this entry are closed.


"Planet Washington" covers politics and government. It is written by journalists in McClatchy's Washington Bureau.

Send a story suggestion or news tip.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31