« GOP announces most promising candidates; Pelosi says Dems will keep control | Main | Miami Republican Lincoln Diaz-Balart to retire »

February 10, 2010

Here's what the U.S. wanted the British to keep secret

Back last year, as you may recall, there was a dustup between the British and the United States over the release of classified documents on the treatment of former Guantanamo detainee Binyam Mohamed, a 31-year-old Ethiopian, who grew up in Britain and ended up in Guantanamo.

British Foreign Secretary David Miliband, told Parliament at the time that the U.S. had threatened to break off intelligence sharing with Great Britain if the British revealed details about how Mohamed had been treated. The British promised to keep the secrets, in the face of court rulings that ordered their release.

That ended Wednesday, when, bowing to a ruling from Britain's Court of Appeal, he Foreign Office posted on its Web site the seven paragraphs on how Mohamed had been treated during his time in U.S. custody.

If you've followed the rulings of U.S. federal judges in the Guantanamo habeas cases, the description won't come as any surprise. There's a growing body of court rulings that pretty much find that U.S. authorities at Guantanamo and elsewhere brutalized more than just high value detainees. But the U.S., even under the Obama administration, would just as soon keep that quiet.

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence issued this disapproving statement:

The protection of confidential information is essential to strong, effective security and intelligence cooperation among allies. The decision by a United Kingdom court to release classified information provided by the United States is not helpful, and we deeply regret it.

The United States and the United Kingdom have a long history of close cooperation that relies on mutual respect for the handling of classified information. This court decision creates additional challenges, but our two countries will remain united in our efforts to fight against violent extremist groups.

Here's what the British found about Mohamed:

[It was reported that a new series of interviews was conducted by the United States authorities prior to 17 May 2001 as part of a new strategy designed by an expert interviewer.

v) It was reported that at some stage during that further interview process by the United States authorities, BM had been intentionally subjected to continuous sleep deprivation. The effects of the sleep deprivation were carefully observed.

vi) It was reported that combined with the sleep deprivation, threats and inducements were made to him. His fears of being removed from United States custody and “disappearing” were played upon.

vii) It was reported that the stress brought about by these deliberate tactics was increased by him being shackled in his interviews

viii) It was clear not only from the reports of the content of the interviews but also from the report that he was being kept under self-harm observation, that the interviews were having a marked effect upon him and causing him significant mental stress and suffering.

ix) We regret to have to conclude that the reports provide to the SyS made clear to anyone reading them that BM was being subjected to the treatment that we have described and the effect upon him of that intentional treatment.

x) The treatment reported, if had been administered on behalf of the United Kingdom, would clearly have been in breach of the undertakings given by the United Kingdom in 1972. Although it is not necessary for us to categorise the treatment reported, it could readily be contended to be at the very least cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment by the United States authorities]"

An Associated Press version of the story can be found here.

The British Foreign Office statement can be found here.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Here's what the U.S. wanted the British to keep secret:


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


So this guy reproted (claimed) to have been deprived of sleep, shackeled, threatened and questioned.
I'm ok with that.

George Myers, Jr.

The "cooperation" is not only "ahistorical" it's also an imitation of bad methods and procedures. In NYC during the American Revolution prisoners, including Ethan Allen were tortured by a Major Cunningham, in a prison today next to City Hall, cited by the NY Times (1909) as "blacker than any black hole of Calcutta" and many thousands perished around the NYC harbor in dis-masted prison ships, a light supposed to be lit in their memory in Fort Greene, Brooklyn where what is left of their human remains are kept. A questionable "first almshouse" cemetery under the walkway in front of the Horace Greeley statue is in City Hall Park near it a a statue in front of City Hall of Nathan Hale, who hung as a spy regretted only having one life to lose for his country. In retaliation for blowing up the fort that became Toronto (actually self-inflicted during the American invasion) the White House was burned in the War of 1812 which America lost, conceivably the lesson learned, to stay within its own borders. Not that British intelligence is that good either, recently two secret reports were found far from their offices, left on a train or somewhere else reported in their news. Around the corner from Guantanamo, America's "last slaver" "Wanderer" sank in a storm on Cape Maysi, which had in 1858 had helped start the Civil War. Are our methods becoming another reason for anarchy? I hope not.


You cant compare us Americans to Nazi Germany. Yes there were times when we mistreated and tortured detaines, but sleep depervation is not torture, and last I heard they were PRISIONERS or Detainees. So why is it so bad that they were shackled. This is just stupid if you wnat to complain about something complain about the what really happened like Britian accutlly releaseing info that was classifed or the times that prisioners were mistreated not this dumb incident.


Really??? That's what all the fuss is about. Not letting him sleep, keeping him shackled, and a little threatening about being forced to leave??? Give me a break! That's not torture when you're dealing with a terrorist. Comparing Americans to Nazis, really? No wonder why our country is falling apart. Too many people don't take the time to seriously look at the facts and think rationally.


ALL is FAIR in love and WAR ,, AND the United States IS AT WAR !! ,, ANY & ALL means , NONE barred should be used to get Intel out of ALL TERRORIST !! , If they still refuse ?? KILL them as they would YOU !!! ,


Americans never learn. Nazi Germany tortured prisoners and have never overcome the stigma. Looking at American political history past and present, we are either headed for a Fascist State if the Republicans control Washington or a Socialist State if the Democrats are in control. We have lost our true democracy because we fail to follow the Constitution. The latest Supreme Court decision to grant corporations and unions the same rights as people is a prime example.

The comments to this entry are closed.


"Planet Washington" covers politics and government. It is written by journalists in McClatchy's Washington Bureau.

Send a story suggestion or news tip.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31