« Book: Edwards tried to cut deal for VP | Main | Obama tours Forbidden City »

November 17, 2009

Conservatives argue for US terrorist trials, prisons

As much of the right pounces on the Obama administration decision to try 9-11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four co-conspirators in a civilian court in New York, a trio of conservatives is saying the US courts and US prisons is precisely the right place for terrorists.

The three -- David Keene of the American Conservative Union, Grover Norquist of Americans for Tax Reform and Bob Barr, a former member of Congress form Georgia – argue that it’s important to close the Guantanamo Bay prison in Cuba and shift trials and detentions to the US justice system as envisioned by the Constitution. (They signed the statement as individuals, not as representatives of their groups.)

They also note that the system already holds hundreds of terrorists without threat to surrounding communities. And, they said, it would save money.

Their statement:

“As it moves to close Guantanamo and develop policies for handling terrorism suspects going forward, the government should rely upon our established, traditional system of justice. This includes our system of federal prisons, which have repeatedly proven they can safely hold persons convicted of terrorism offenses. We are confident that the government can preserve national security without resorting to sweeping and radical departures from an American constitutional tradition that has served us effectively for over two centuries.

“Civilian federal courts are the proper forum for terrorism cases. Civilian prisons are the safe, cost effective and appropriate venue to hold persons convicted in federal courts. Over the last two decades, federal courts constituted under Article III of the U.S. Constitution have proven capable of trying a wide array of terrorism cases, without sacrificing either national security or fair trial standards.

“Likewise the federal prison system has proven itself fully capable of safely holding literally hundreds of convicted terrorists with no threat or danger to the surrounding community. That system includes the "supermax" facility in Florence, Colorado, arguably the most secure prison in the world, as well as other truly "maximum security" and state of the art facilities. In addition, state facilities, including those at Thomson, Illinois and elsewhere around the country, can be used with any appropriate security upgrades our law enforcement professionals deem necessary. 

“This makes good sense for the taxpayers who have invested millions of dollars in these facilities and who are seeing millions wasted every month at the costly, inefficient Guantanamo facility.  It makes sense for the community, which will benefit from the related employment and has absolutely no reason to fear that prisoners will escape or be released into their communities. The scaremongering about these issues should stop.

“But most of all it makes sense for America because it is a critical link in the process of closing Guantanamo and getting this country back to using its tried and true, constitutionally sound institutions.”


For more, www.constitutionproject.org

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c64169e2012875ad2b54970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Conservatives argue for US terrorist trials, prisons:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

nancy

There is quite a difference between a criminal and a terrorist. If someone robs you of even one dollar, he is then a criminal. If someone flies a plane into two buildings and kills over 3000 people, he is a terrorist.
These people have no place in our criminal system, they are terrorists, try them in a military court. Idiots.

Danny Johnson

I never thought I would ever agree with a "prominent conservative" but I'm forced to eat my words. America is founded on the concept of public trials not secret tribunals. America has a criminal justice system and usually it works pretty well.
These people are criminals and should be tried just like any other criminal. A public trial for their accused crimes, appropriate punishment if convicted. That's how we do things in America. At least that's how it's supposed to be done in America.

Lex

It is good to see such prominent conservatives as Barr, Keene and even Norquist on the right side of this issue, even if they clearly support the same side for different reasons. Considering how much of a no-brainer this question is, the opposition has gotten hysterical.

The comments to this entry are closed.

ABOUT THIS BLOG

"Planet Washington" covers politics and government. It is written by journalists in McClatchy's Washington Bureau.

Send a story suggestion or news tip.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

THIS MONTH

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29      

BLOGROLL