« GOP doesn't see much good news in latest jobless numbers | Main | White House launches health care myth-response site »

August 09, 2009

Sunday talk of Guantanamo

Posting for  David Goldstein: 


    Guantanamo was one of the issues du jour on the Sunday talkfests today.

     National Security Advisor Jim Jones said the White House has “every intention” of meeting President Obama’s January deadline to close the detention camp in Cuba and relocate the prisoners to an American facility.

    “I think we will,” he said on CBS’ Face the Nation. “I think there are some things on the table we can’t talk about right now.”

      On Fox News Sunday, Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky warned that Guantanamo was “not broke” and that the president would meet resistance.

    “I think Congress will be on, a bipartisan basis, aggressively opposing efforts to change it,” he said.

     The military prison at Fort Leavenworth, Ks. and a maximum security prison in Michigan have emerged as two potential replacement sites for Guantanamo.

     But the political leadership in Kansas, including its two Republican senators, Pat Roberts and Sam Brownback, is strongly lobbying against the idea.

     Democratic Sen. Carl Levin of Michigan said on CBS that his state would accept the detainees. He said he didn’t see why a maximum security facility couldn’t handle them.

      Levin said he agrees with the White House that the detention camp should be shut down. Former President George W. Bush, leading military officials and several former secretaries of state back the idea as well, he 
noted.

   “Guantanamo has been used by terrorists as a training tool,” said Levin, who chairs the Senate Armed Services Committee. “It is a security threat as long as we keep it open.”


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c64169e20120a4dd65c4970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Sunday talk of Guantanamo :

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Girma

Does our country have no maximum security pension? What is the need for Guantanamo to stay for some very few numbers of terrorists or others? The more Guantanamo stayed the more we pay for unnecessary cost and the more haters to America is continuing.

Bill Keller

Good for you, Senator Levin. We need not fold to those with cartilage as backbone. We have to demonstrate that our rule of law will guide us and not the fear of terrorists. The fear of our enemies appears to drive those who would resist the closure of Gitmo.

The comments to this entry are closed.

ABOUT THIS BLOG

"Planet Washington" covers politics and government. It is written by journalists in McClatchy's Washington Bureau.

Send a story suggestion or news tip.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

THIS MONTH

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29      

BLOGROLL