A top Democrat Sunday urged President-elect Barack Obama to get more personally involved now in efforts to help the economy, and not to wait until taking office on Jan. 20.
A senior Obama adviser, meanwhile, accused the Bush administration of doing little to help, vowing that things will change once Obama is sworn in. "The era of dithering is going to end," said Obama adviser Austan Goolsbee.
The question of Obama's role as president-elect during an economic crisis loomed large Sunday, as he prepares to unveil his economic team at a news conference Monday in Chicago, moving up a loose timetable that originally would have held all the cabinet announcements until after Thanksgiving.
"I want him to offer his assistance. He is a person who can really bring people together," said Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., during an appearance on CNN's Late Edition program.
"I would like him at least offer to become more involved, and I think that offer would be welcomed, not just by the Democrats, the House and the Senate, but also by the White House itself that has a different view on it."
Obama has steadfastly resisted getting more involved in current policy, refusing to attend a summit meeting of 20 nations on the economy, and resigning his seat in the Senate. He says repeatedly that the country has, and should have, only one president at a time.
Yet he did send representatives to the G-20 summit to meet with foreign leaders, and helped boost stock markets last Friday when news leaked that he would nominate New York Federal Reserve Bank President Timothy Geithner as his Secretary of the Treasury.
Obama also used his weekly radio address Saturday to promise a stimulus plan that would save or create 2.5 million jobs over two years by rebuilding roads and bridges, modernizing schools and helping build energy efficient cars. He did not offer any details.
As Levin pressed for more involvement, Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, said Obama was doing the right thing by staying out of any public role in the current policy debate.
"I think he's playing it just right," Hutchison said, also on CNN. "I think certainly we all want to know what his views are because we know by January 20th that whatever his views are probably are going to have great weight.
"But I think he is playing it right to not jump in and be critical of what the president is doing. And I think on this particular point, the president is right and I think there is a very bipartisan view about using money that could possibly be used effectively right now, let it be recycled through and try keep an eye on the taxpayers."
Goolsbee, a University of Chicago economist expected to also be named to the Clinton White House economic team, on Sunday refused to put a price tag on Obama's stimulus but suggested it would be big enough for some shock value above and beyond the value of each component.
Some, such as Sen. Chuck Schumer, D, N.Y., guessed it could top $500 billion.
"I don't know what the exact number is, but it's going to be a big number. It has to be," Goolsbee said on CBS's Face the Nation program. "The point is to, kind of, get people back on track and startle the thing into submission."
Goolsbee vowed a dramatic change from Bush administration, accusing the incumbent of a laissez-faire approach as the economy turned bad.
"We've had a period, under this administration, where they resisted the idea of economic recovery. The approach has been, let's, sort of, look the other way and things will get better," Goolsbee said.
"We've tried not having a stimulus. We've tried not having a housing plan. We've tried not giving tax cuts to ordinary Americans. And it hasn't worked. I mean, look out the window. That's where it is. And so ... that era of dithering is going to end. Starting January 20, Obama's coming in. We're out with the dithering. We're in with a bang. That's what it's got to be."