« The king of Jordan, Mike Mullen and the Daily Show with Jon Stewart | Main | Iran responds to the IAEA »

February 17, 2010

Chalabi v. Washington

Hard to believe this guy once sat behind First Lady Laura Bush during the State of the Union address.

Iraqi politician and invasion booster Ahmed Chalabi and the United States are locked in an increasingly bitter war of words and policies.

Chalabi plays a leading role on Iraq's Justice and Accountability Commission, which has been weeding out suspected Baathists - members of Saddam's Hussein's outlawed Baath party - from participating in the March 7 election. Critics and Iraq's Sunni politicians, say the effort is politicized, designed to keep Sunnis out of power and strengthen the Shiite majority's hold on Iraq's government. The Obama administration, eager to see political reconciliation in Iraq, appears to sympathize with that view.

Chalabi; top aide Entifadh Qanbar; and Ali Faisal al-Lami, who heads the commission, have been sending daily email broadsides, denouncing what they say is U.S. interference in Iraq's election. (A bit ironic, since it was U.S. "interference" in Iraq with hundreds of thousands of troops that ended Chalabi's multi-decade exile from Iraq and helped him get where he is now).

Then on Tuesday, Gen. Raymond Odierno, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, told a Washington audience something that McClatchy and others have reported. Chalabi and al-Lami "clearly are influenced by Iran," he said. "We have direct intelligence that tells us that."

Al-Lami, in a statement today, said he was "surprised and dismayed" at Odierno's "inappropriate diatribe."  

"The pique and anger of the US officials including General Odierno’s with regard to their failure to re-introduce Baathists into the Iraqi political process is not the responsibility of the" commission, he wrote. "The efforts of intimidating the JAC are counterproductive." (The statement didn't mention the substance of Odierno's comments about the two men's ties to Iran).

Fast forward to this afternoon, where US ambassador to Iraq Chris Hill briefed the press. He seconded Odierno's comments and expanded on them, noting that Chalabi originally was appointed to a De-Baathifcation Commission by then-U.S. consul Paul Bremer. That panel went out of business two year ago, but Chalabi, unlike the other members, stayed on "in a new committee, to which he was never named," Hill said.

"I don't need to relate to you or anyone else here the fact that this is a gentlemen who has been challenged over the years to be seen as a straightforward individual," Hill added. Ouch. The U.S. government hasn't cut off all contact with Chalabi, but has "kind of moved on," he said. Indeed.

 

 

 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c64169e20120a8ae748f970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Chalabi v. Washington:

Comments

Warren

Do tell more! I'm at wstrobel@mcclatchydc.com

DARRELL BENTON

all they need do is investigate his finiancial interests and see what companies he was involved with worked for a company that had ties with him a contractor working for the us army and it was the most corrupt company ever and even the us military knew about it because they brought in military QAQC inspectors finially to get a handle on what was going on.

Faisal Kadri

The US is running out of options in Iraq but worse, it is running out of initiative. With Chalabi running the show the US will soon have to receive him as an elected official. Don't blame the Iraqis, Chalabi could not secure even one seat in the last elections. But now many Iraqis are not motivated to vote because of the atmosphere of fear and partial election committees. Yet there will be many brave Iraqi citizens who will vote and some will risk their lives reporting irregularities. In order to encourage wider participation the voter needs to know what will happen if the elections were deemed not credible by the international observers, will it be left to the Chalabi controlled committees to make the final word? My Iraqi friends and I are waiting for Pres. Obama clarifies this point soon.

Ron

I guess he hasn't faced a war crimes tribunal yet because he has too much dirt on the Bush administration.

borisjimbo

Why hasn't that man faced a war crimes tribunal yet?

The comments to this entry are closed.

ABOUT THIS BLOG

"Nukes & Spooks" is written by McClatchy correspondents Jonathan S. Landay (national security and intelligence), Warren P. Strobel (foreign affairs and the State Department), and Nancy Youssef (Pentagon).

jon, nancy & warren

Landay, Youssef and Strobel.

Send a story suggestion or news tip.
Read more stories by Jonathan Landay.
Read more stories by Warren Strobel.
Read more stories by Nancy Youssef.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

THIS MONTH

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3 4 5
    6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19
    20 21 22 23 24 25 26
    27 28