« Afghan run off election likely | Main | The State Deparment says invest in Iraq -- sort of »

October 19, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c64169e20120a64f9ff1970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Where's Dick?:

Comments

Perk

Brainstorming:

Anonymous CIA officials point out, 2 weeks after the speech, the "leak" about "Chaosisitan".
( http://www.newsweek.com/id/217108 )

Biden asks in the interim why more money is not being spent in Pakistan ( presumably on CIA drone-type attacks since sending in official US ground troops is out of the question)

Apparently, the CIA is suddenly leaking on McChrystal . Why? Possibly to further the Biden plan that would give them the huge increase in funding that would come from leading the war (now a secret drone war) in the region.

Admittedly, such a CIA war has an appeal. No real US troops and the accompanying political liability
They can hire Uzbecki's Chechnians, or Cubans, to invade Pakistan.

They can meet with warloads ( tribal leaders) , offer them the choice:
"take of a ton of money, or watch the skies for you and your family's demise"
type of deal.

Politicians have full deniability:
"We just voted to increase CIA funding" we had no IDEA they would use it this way", if it fails.

If it succeeds, many American lives saved, terrorists gone, happy tribal leaders, happy politicians everywhere.

John Dingler

If the US can just hire Uzbecki's Chechens, Cubans, or US Homeless to invade Pakistan, why wouldn't this motly crew be just a version of the Taliban, they being terrorist foreigners who infiltrate a country, hence subject to the same criticism?

Perk

That is the CIA advantage. Criticized by who? You think CNN will be embedded with the CIA? The only opinions will be held by those that are alive and rich, which will be positive, or dead, which will have little to say ( sorry, that is harsh-truth). The military has some accountability. The CIA, no. How many interviews have the CIA granted about the thousands of Drone Attacks on a foreign country that officially denies are even happening. The press looks the other way on this stuff. Hence the advantage.

Really, how they are "viewed" only is important to the media. If we get the results, we will spin it as needed. No US reporter will be there, at least not one that doesn't think that the administration is doing the noble thing.

Perk

First of all, my comments represent a hypothetical "solution" for an America that insists on pursuing this strategy.

Personally, we accomplished the goal years ago by invading Afghanistan in search of Bin-Laudin. The message was: we will pursue to the ends of the earth the one that attacked us. We made that point and should have pulled out after a year.

If we find and kill Bin-Laudin, we make him a martyr . If we just stopped at making him impotent to live in the open and attack again, because the cost to anyone giving him sanctuary is astronomical, we would have been more effective than continuing this farce with no end-mission.

jon grand

Where's Dick? With his outsized sense of self-importance and certitude concerning the primacy of his own judgements, its hard to imagine him missing. It would not suprise me if were visble from space. I don't doubt his talents or his intellegence. but he too often represents the hazards of "foreign policy by ego".

borisjimbo

jon grand, are you sure you're talking about the right Dick?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

ABOUT THIS BLOG

"Nukes & Spooks" is written by McClatchy correspondents Jonathan S. Landay (national security and intelligence), Warren P. Strobel (foreign affairs and the State Department), and Nancy Youssef (Pentagon).

jon, nancy & warren

Landay, Youssef and Strobel.

Send a story suggestion or news tip.
Read more stories by Jonathan Landay.
Read more stories by Warren Strobel.
Read more stories by Nancy Youssef.

Receive updates to this blog by email. Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


THIS MONTH

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7
    8 9 10 11 12 13 14
    15 16 17 18 19 20 21
    22 23 24 25 26 27 28
    29 30