« Hillary got game? | Main | GTMO recidivism rate: 14 percent, 7 percent or 4 percent? »

July 17, 2009

House intel panel to probe CIA's notification policy

The chairman of the House intelligence commitee, Rep. Silvestre Reyes, D-Texas, said Friday that the panel is opening an investigation into whether the CIA has properly notified Congress of significant covert actions.

Reyes' move was triggered by CIA Director Leon Panetta's June 24 disclosure that Congress had not been notified of a major planned counter-terrorism program, later reported to be an agency effort to form elite teams to hunt down and kill top terrorist operatives at close range. The effort never got off the ground, and then-Vice President Dick Cheney told the agency not to tell Congress' intelligence committees of the matter.

The news of the probe could be a further disappointment to President Barack Obama, who has resisted a whole-scale investigation into alleged wrong-doing on the national security front by the Bush administration, fearing it would complicate his domestic and security agenda.

Republicans on Capitol Hll oppose the probe, and accuse Democrats of politicizing the agency.

The American Civil Liberties Union welcomed the investigation. "We know now more than ever that government transparency is essential to a functioning democracy and our government cannot be held accountable if Congress and the American people are left in the dark. Only by vigorously exercising its oversight responsibility can Congress reassert its critical role as an effective check against abuse of executive authority," Michael Macleod-Ball of the ACLU's Washington office said in a statment.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c64169e201157213c941970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference House intel panel to probe CIA's notification policy:

Comments

Strangely Enough

"Also, why would congress fulfilling their oversight responsibilities complicate the president's domestic and security agenda?"
I would assume the illegality of so much of the PSP, torture, and whatever other "significant actions" would have complicated Cheney's agenda had they been informed.

valdis

Two questions--

"The effort never got off the ground", what does that mean exactly and how do we know this?

Also, why would congress fulfilling their oversight responsibilities complicate the president's domestic and security agenda?

Best Regards

The comments to this entry are closed.

ABOUT THIS BLOG

"Nukes & Spooks" is written by McClatchy correspondents Jonathan S. Landay (national security and intelligence), Warren P. Strobel (foreign affairs and the State Department), and Nancy Youssef (Pentagon).

jon, nancy & warren

Landay, Youssef and Strobel.

Send a story suggestion or news tip.
Read more stories by Jonathan Landay.
Read more stories by Warren Strobel.
Read more stories by Nancy Youssef.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

THIS MONTH

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3 4 5
    6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19
    20 21 22 23 24 25 26
    27 28