Well, we now know what happened in Farah province. On Friday evening, the Pentagon released an unclassified version of its executive summary about the May 4 incident. The report is damning, in that spells out how the military violated its own rules of engagement and that those violations may have led to as many as 86 civilians killed. But today, there were some signs that the Farah incident is also leading to change. We heard out of Kabul today that Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the top commander there, has ordered his forces to apply more stringent rules to their use of air power when chasing Taliban forces hiding amongst Afghan civilians.
He called on U.S. forces to limit its use of air power to instances when U.S. troops could be overrun in an effort to limit civilian casualties. According to this report, McChrystal told his forces, “When we shoot into a compound, that should only be for the protection of our forces. …I want everyone to understand that.”
The change is the military’s acknowledgment that killing civilians ultimately may lead ot more fighters, not less, no matter how many Taliban are killed in an airstrike. But using less air power could come at a cost. The United States has come to depend on air power, in part, because it doesn’t have enough ground forces. Moving forward, I wonder if a more stringent use of air power mean that the commander will eventually have to ask for more ground troops.

thank you
Posted by: استضافه | June 22, 2009 at 09:46 PM
I guess if you're a Taliban commander, your new orders are to attack American forces from populated areas.
Posted by: Matt | June 23, 2009 at 12:08 PM
This is just more rhetoric, not actual policy change.
How many times in recent years have we heard that US Forces are going to be more selective with use of air power...
...and yet civilians still die in busloads....
Posted by: Gabe | June 23, 2009 at 12:31 PM
The T-ban/AQ KNOW that we do not bomb civilians. Thats why they use them as "shields"...more UAV's, more troops will be needed. I always ask why we don't hit THEM where they lie thier heads at nite. P-stan is a better spot than A-stan for those swine. In Quetta they walk around and act with impunity, so why not start there?
Posted by: SkysoldierLRS101st | July 06, 2009 at 10:30 AM