Frank Rich on McClatchy's national security team
Not to toot our horn and all, but in case you missed it, NY Times columnist Frank Rich had uber-kind words on Sunday for McClatchy's Washington bureau.
Read it here.
« US, S. Korean forces boost intelligence collection, not combat readiness | Main | The Army's new secretary »
June 01, 2009
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c64169e2011570b6d059970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Frank Rich on McClatchy's national security team:
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
ABOUT THIS BLOG
"Nukes & Spooks" is written by McClatchy correspondents Jonathan S. Landay (national security and intelligence), Warren P. Strobel (foreign affairs and the State Department), and Nancy Youssef (Pentagon).
Landay, Youssef and Strobel.
Send a story suggestion or news tip.
Read more stories by Jonathan Landay.
Read more stories by Warren Strobel.
Read more stories by Nancy Youssef.
MCCLATCHY LINKS
RECENT POSTS
- New NIE on Iran nuke program appears to differ little from 2007 findings
- U.S. civilian intelligence program budget request made public for first time
- Central Asia on the brink?
- Human Rights Watch: Iraqi units under Maliki running secret detention site
- Senate committee report sees security risks facing U.S. diplomats in Iraq
- Mrs Obama to appear on Oprah to talk about military families
- Petraeus issues state of the Afghan war assessment
- How much did it cost to enforce DADT? On average, $52,800 per service member
- 30 years later, Iran hostages try to bridge gap between Tehran, Washington
- Lunch at the State Department
THIS MONTH
ARCHIVES
BLOGROLL
- Project on Nuclear Issues
- SpyTalk
- U.S. Army Combined Arms Center
- The Dreyfuss Report
- Federation of the American Scientist: Secrecy News
- Wired: Danger Room
- U.S. Government Interagency Counterinsurgency Initiative
- CounterTerrorism Blog
- National Counter-Terrorism Center
- State Department annual terrorism reports
- Treasury Department Office of Terrorism & Financial Intelligence
- Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism
- Combating Terrorism Center at West Point
- Arms Control Wonk
- Warandpiece.com
- Small Wars Journal
- Arms Control Association
- Director of National Intelligence
- Central Intelligence Agency
- National Security Agency
- Department of Homeland Security
- Department of Defense
- Joint Chiefs of Staff
- The Pentagon
MCCLATCHY NEWSPAPERS
- Anchorage Daily News (AK)
- Beaufort Gazette (SC)
- Belleville News-Democrat (IL)
- Bellingham Herald (WA)
- Biloxi Sun Herald (MS)
- Bradenton Herald (FL)
- Centre Daily Times (PA)
- Charlotte Observer (NC)
- Columbus Ledger-Enquirer (GA)
- El Nuevo Herald (FL)
- Fort Worth Star-Telegram (TX)
- Fresno Bee (CA)
- Idaho Statesman (ID)
- Island Packet (SC)
- Kansas City Star (MO)
- Lexington Herald-Leader (KY)
- Macon Telegraph (GA)
- Merced Sun-Star (CA)
- Miami Herald (FL)
- Modesto Bee (CA)
- Myrtle Beach Sun News (SC)
- Olathe News (KS)
- The Olympian (WA)
- Raleigh News & Observer (NC)
- Rock Hill Herald (SC)
- Sacramento Bee (CA)
- The State (SC)
- San Luis Obispo Tribune (CA)
- Tacoma News Tribune (WA)
- Tri-City Herald (WA)
- Wichita Eagle (KS)
advertisement
FYI - Rich is a partisan of the left. It would be NEWS if someone not of the left endorsed McClatchy. Your respect amongst lefties wasn't really of question.
Posted by: Mark Eichenlaub | June 10, 2009 at 08:53 AM
http://www.pearlsjewelry.co.uk/category/pearl-bracelets-rings
http://www.pearlsjewelry.co.uk/category/freshwater-pearls
A good fame is better than a good face.
Posted by: bracelet | June 05, 2009 at 10:35 PM
Thanks for the reply and keep up the great work.
Posted by: Strangely Enough | June 04, 2009 at 04:19 PM
Superb interview -- amazingly, Matthews didn't interupt constantly. Your fact-filled responses, plus citing numerous sources, were really heartening to watch, as for so many years it's felt like the news has been one big Hall of Mirrors.
Many thanks.
Posted by: readerOfTeaLeaves | June 02, 2009 at 09:58 PM
Hi Strangely Enough: I logged on to congratulate my colleagues on the NYT mention, and I saw your comment. You raise an excellent question. I imagine that it is some combination of both. More than anything, Maliki and Odierno's reaction told me how truly fragile the situation is, both in terms of the security on the ground and how Iraqis receive U.S. troops on their soil. That was how I read it anyway.
So with that, congrats Warren and Jonathan. And dear readers, you can watch my colleagues on MSNBC in about five minutes!
Posted by: Nancy Youssef | June 02, 2009 at 05:06 PM
The article on the Maliki connection to Obama's decision to not release the photos was informative.
My only question is: would the release of the photos actually cause an increase in violence as claimed, or is the real fear that the photos would doom any long term U.S. military presence in Iraq?
They didn't build all those bases to leave...
Posted by: Strangely Enough | June 02, 2009 at 12:19 PM