Syria & Sanctions
There are limits to engagement, apparently. President Barack Obama this week extended sanctions on Syria that were passed by Congress and signed into law by then-President Bush in 2004. Obama's action comes the same week in which he sent two senior officials to Damascus to try to explore better relations with the government of President Bashar Assad.
That may seem a bit oxymoronic, and perhaps it is. But it also reflects Obama's--and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's--caution in reaching out to U.S. adversaries, Obama has gone full-bore in some cases, as with Iran, where the administration at times seems to be tripping over itself in its urgency to start a dialogue with Tehran. And there's no equivocation in Obama's general outreach to the Muslim world.
But with Syria and another country--Cuba--Obama and his team appear to be saying, in essence, the ball's in your court. They have made gestures to both countries, and are waiting to see if Syria and Cuba respond in kind.
In a statement Friday, Obama said he extended the sanctions for 1 year because "the actions of the government of Syria in supporting terrorism, pursuing weapons of mass destruction and missile programs, and undermining U.S. and international efforts with respect to the stabilization and reconstruction of Iraq pose a continuing and unusual extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States."
That may well be true. But for the Assad regime, which just received the two presidential envoys, it's got to be a bit confusing--like a bad case of diplomatic whiplash.
The sanctions prohibit Syrian airlines from operating in the United States; block Syrian with suspected terrorist links from accessing the U.S. financial system; and prohibit arms sales.

http://www.pearl-jewelry.com.au/
http://www.pearl-jewelry.com.au/category/pearl-jewelry
http://www.pearl-jewelry.com.au/category/cultured-pearls
A good fame is better than a good face.
A good medicine tastes bitter.
Read to exercise the brain.
Posted by: bracelet | June 05, 2009 at 10:37 PM
All foreign aid and all economic sanctions are UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Therefore, they should be reported in the context of WHETHER THEY SHOULD EXIST AT ALL. Besides, foreign aid and sanctions only hurt everyday people and private businesses. Governments never suffer from sanctions; they only benefit from them. PLEASE KEEP THIS IN MIND WHEN YOU--AND THE REST OF THE DEPLORABLE ASSOCIATED "PRESS"--REPORT ON SUCH MATTERS. Thank you, in advance.
Posted by: No more superficial storylines, please | May 15, 2009 at 06:42 PM
Have you seen this very strange story concerning the sanctions extension:
http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/05/12/news/world/doc4a09180c2f160574079903.txt
Biological Weapons, Instead Of Nuclear Reactor, Keep Syria Within Axis Of Evil
By David Bedein, Middle East Correspondent
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
?
I'd think it bogus, but the Feltman/Shapiro (the two envoys mentioned) trip to Damascus last week did seem to come out of nowhere.
Any opinions?
Posted by: Deus Vult | May 15, 2009 at 09:18 AM
I would like to know what exactly Obama expects. He is good at making speeches about how we should all work together, but his actions belie his words -- almost always. I have to see yet in Obama something different than in Bush, except the spin.
Posted by: Bergamo | May 14, 2009 at 03:31 AM