The future of "Don't Ask Don't Tell"
Hello everyone. This week, Rep. Ellen Tauscher, Democrat of California, proposed repealing the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” ban on gays serving openly in the military. This is not the first such legislation to appear on Capitol Hill but it is the first under this administration. I am not an expert on this matter but from what I can tell there are two debates happening in Washington, one amongst politicians and the other with military circles. The pols, particularly those who support repealing the policy, are asking whether that position is politically viable. And the military is asking whether the armed forces are ready to embrace an open policy.
For whatever it's worth, in my cursory polling of the military, I have found that younger servicemen are quicker to embrace the repeal than the older superiors.
But where that leaves the future of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell is a little unclear. In response to the proposed bill, White House spokesman Thomas Vietor said the following: “The President supports changing Don’t Ask Don’t Tell. As part of a long standing pledge, he has also begun consulting closely with Secretary Gates and Chairman Mullen so that this change is done in a sensible way that strengthens our armed forces and our national security.”
And yet Geoff Morrell, Pentagon spokesman, said at a briefing today that he is not aware of any formal review: Here is the transcript of his comments:
Question: Earlier in the week, the White House, in responding to some queries about this new legislation to lift the ban on gays serving in the military said that the White House has been consulting with the secretary and the Joint Chiefs. Can you shed any more light on what that means? Has there been any formal direction to study the issue? Basically, it was a very general statement -- just -- (inaudible). What does that mean?
Morrell: Yeah. I -- you know, Brian, I don't have anything particularly new for you on that. I noticed that the White House had a statement to that effect. I think I'd refer you to them in terms of what took place in that meeting. I wouldn't want to begin to speak for what the president did or did not ask of the secretary or the chairman. So I'm sorry, I just have to really refer you to the White House for additional questions on that.
Question: Just to follow on that, is the DoD conducting any review of the issue? Or have they been tasked to do so?
Morrell: Right now, Don't Ask, Don't Tell remains the law of the land, and we are following it. I am not aware of any internal review that's under way in this department. That's not to say that one won't be asked of us, or -- but I don't believe that there is one currently under way.
So is change coming? I am not sure. But in his book, Unfriendly Fire: How the Gay Ban Undermines the Military and Weakens America, Nathaniel Frank writes that in other countries, such a change usually comes because military commanders are ordered by their civilian leadership to do so, not from the military institutions themselves. If that indeed holds up, we will have to turn to the White House to settle the debate.

Military unit cohesion is based on the concept of "fraternity". To you nonmiltary types unit cohesion is what holds the miltary together. If it goes so does your military.
Young gays tend to copulate with one another like animals in heat.(And there are multiple scientific studies confirming this.)Their personal lives revolve around the concept of "eros".(I don't personally care what they do in their private lives. If they have the sexual itch,that can't be scratched that's their business.)
As a former Marine Corps platoon commander, I can assure you that a US Marine Corps rifle platoon engaged in combat is a very brutal environment,and the fine nuances of politcal correctness have no bearing there.
You put outed gays in the front line combat envirionment, and when the order to fire is given. A number of the gays will end up with a round in the back of their heads. Spare me the bleating about it! I did'nt say it was right! It is just what I believe will happen based of my experience.
So now you have dead gay guys murdered by their own. And you have our front line combat units killing themselves, and not the enemy.
You have lost unit cohesion, and set the scene for military disaster. Which may actually be the real reason for pushing gays onto the military in the first place.
Posted by: Highlander | March 18, 2009 at 10:04 PM
A majority of combat troops in Iraq and Afghanistan support letting gays and lesbians serve openly. If the desk jockeys in the Pentagon don't like it, they can volunteer for combat duty.
Posted by: August West | March 06, 2009 at 04:11 PM