US, Russia cooperate on securing spent nuke fuel
Even as the United States and Russia spare over Georgia, U.S. missile defense plans and Iran, the two sides have been quietly working to ensure that nuclear materials stay out of the hands of terrorists.
The National Nuclear Security Administration, overseer of the U.S. nuclear arsenal, Thursday announced the "successful" completion of a hush-hush operation in which nearly 341 pounds of spent Soviet-era highly enriched uranium fuel were transported from Hungary to a secure facility in Russia.
The shipment was the largest of four shipments of spent HEU reactor fuel removed from facilities in former Soviet bloc countries and deposited in secure facilities over a year-long period. The other three countries are the Czech Republic, Latvia and Bulgaria. The NNSA explained that during the Cold War, the Soviet Union supplied HEU fuel to research reactors run by its allies and republics.
The NNSA said it worked closely with Russia, Hungary, Slovenia, the International Atomic Energy Agency and EURATOM, the European nuclear agency, to transport the spent HEU from Hungary to Russia.
The material was loaded into 13 special casks, transported under high security by rail to the Slovenian port of Koper, shipped in a special cargo vessel to a secure seaport in Russia and then taken by train to a secure storage site.
So perhaps the state of U.S.-Russian relations is better than generally believed. On the other hand . . .

Spar instead of spare?
That's like saying almost only counts in horse shoes, hand grenades and nuclear weapons...
Sparing is a wake up call to educate. This is not new news...We are talking about nuclear weapons here and there is no time to spare....
Posted by: The Storm | October 26, 2008 at 06:50 PM
Spar instead of spare?
Posted by: Oscar | October 25, 2008 at 02:59 PM
By the way, the actual question that should be asked is not "if" there is that much material. But have we started or where are we with the tagging program?
The short answer? Way behind....
Posted by: The Storm | October 25, 2008 at 02:48 PM
Hey General Patten
That number I cited is low it was actually some 410 MT that was either poorly secured or not secured at all back in 2003 and it came from a University Of Richmond at Virgina study on the Russian HEU problem titled "Loose Nukes: Nuclear Materials Security in Russia, by G.P Gilfoyle....
Start small? How about getting with the program? We are way behind......
Posted by: The Storm | October 25, 2008 at 02:42 PM
I am glad to hear that the two countries are taking care of some of these things and wish this cooperation transcended on other problems too.
Posted by: Moscow travel | October 24, 2008 at 10:07 AM
Meh, it's a start. Don't be such a downer. You gotta start small, and eventually work your way up to the big numbers. Besides, what hat did you pull that number out of? 341 metric tons seems a bit arbitrary to me, and a bit much. Seriously, there can't be that much HEU in the former Soviet bloc, can there?
Posted by: Patton | October 23, 2008 at 11:38 PM
341 pounds? That nice just 341 Metrics tons or 692 251.503 26 pound to go....... Who is NNSA kidding?
Posted by: The Storm | October 23, 2008 at 09:17 PM