« Is Sen. McCain politicizing the military? | Main | Suicide prevention on the battlefield »

May 30, 2008

Pakistan: Pouring gasoline on a fire

Anti-U.S. sentiments are already seething in nuclear-armed Pakistan, as is popular hatred for the Bush administration's "indispensible" ally in its so-called war on terror, the former dictator and army chief, President Pervez Musharraf.

Yet there's President Bush calling Musharraf to give him a reassuring pat on the back as Musharraf faces growing pressure to resign.

"The president reiterated the United States' strong support for Pakistan and he indicated he looked forward to President Musharraf's continuing role in further strengthening U.S.-Pakistani relations," said White House spokeswoman Dana Perino.

No matter how the White House spins it, Bush's call will be seen by most Pakistanis as yet more confirmation that the U.S. is out to shore up Musharraf in defiance of the results of free and fair elections in February in which Musharraf's political allies were trounced by an opposition coalition led by the party of slain prime minister Benazir Bhutto.

Administration officials will undoubtedly point to that bit about Bush reiterating "strong support for Pakistan" and say that the president was just expressing his hope that Musharraf won't make things worse as the new coalition continues to self-destruct over what to do about him and the dozens of judges he purged last year. (The silence on that issue of an administration that portrays itself as a defender of democracy is a prime reason why the U.S. is so disliked.)

Yet under Pakistan's constitution, foreign policy is made by the elected federal government and the president is largely a ceremonial figurehead.

So why is Bush urging Musharraf to continue playing a key role in guiding the county's most important foreign relationship?

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c64169e200e552aaaba68834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Pakistan: Pouring gasoline on a fire:

Comments

Andreas Ramos

Any ideas who was behind the bombing of the Danish embassy? How did the government react (and perform)? There are parrallels to the burning of the US embassy back in the 1979.

Outside Looking In

Throwing gasoline on a fire is a perfect metaphor for Bu$h's support of Musharraf.

I am not surprised that Bu$h has yet to realize that it is this type of "support" that fuels Bin Laden, his supporters, and the hatred of the US in the Middle East.

Perhaps Bu$h as come to the conclusion that Obama will succeed him in office so he's preparing a welcoming committee of global discontent for the new Cabinet to deal with on day one.

Rob Hager

Good article. Suppoert for Musharaff has consistently disserved US national security concerns in Pakistan, as shown when the February 18 elections restored a secular government to the NWFP, when Musharaff was rejected and the Taliban party ejected from government.

http://impeachbothnow.blogspot.com/2008/05/bushcheney-violate-law-requiring-anti.html

ADNK

And we all are "just expressing" our hope that Bush won't make things worse as the OUR administration gets elected and sworn in. A little reality-based foreign policy is sorely needed soon.

And THANKS to the McClatchy Clatch for the years of real journalism in the punditry desert of America!

The comments to this entry are closed.

ABOUT THIS BLOG

"Nukes & Spooks" is written by McClatchy correspondents Jonathan S. Landay (national security and intelligence), Warren P. Strobel (foreign affairs and the State Department), and Nancy Youssef (Pentagon).

jon, nancy & warren

Landay, Youssef and Strobel.

Send a story suggestion or news tip.
Read more stories by Jonathan Landay.
Read more stories by Warren Strobel.
Read more stories by Nancy Youssef.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

THIS MONTH

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3 4 5
    6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19
    20 21 22 23 24 25 26
    27 28