Today, we're continuing our on-going seminar on foreign policy, a topic we'll likely be returning to repeatedly as the U.S. presidential campaign moves forward...
President Bush's foreign policy has obviously run into some, er, problems, what with seemingly stalemated ground wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Iran refusing to abandon its nuclear program, a global credit crunch, and rising food and energy prices. Not to mention a declining U.S. image worldwide.
Where do we go from here? This morning, the McClatchy Washington bureau heard from one man who believes he has some answers to that question: Joseph Nye, Harvard University professor, former assistant secretary of defense, and author of a new book, The Powers to Lead.
Nye is a leading proponent of using 'smart power.' What's that? It's a combination of hard power (basically the threat or use of military force) and soft power (other tools to get what we want, including public diplomacy, negotiations and alliances, U.S. economic power, American values, etc.)
Nye acknowledges he adopted the term 'smart power' because it is more politically saleable than 'soft power,' which, if used by a political candidate, could leave him or her open to charges of being 'soft' on national security. But that's precisely the problem Nye argues:
"We tend to think about power as hard power. I bomb you, so I'm powerful ... The discourse in this country is truncated."
Nye--and here we must point out he served in the Clinton administration--says President Bush's post-9/11 policies that emphasized unilateralism and military force have hurt U.S. interests. (He and former deputy secretary of state Richard Armitage, whose served in Republican administrations, co-chaired a commission on restoring U.S. leadership through smart power. They testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee this morning).
Nye said the Bush administration has slowly come around in its second term to realizing that the United States must use all the tools it has to advance its interests, not just military ones. He cited a November speech by Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who called for an increase in the State Department budget. (Yes, you read that right, the Pentagon chief called for more State Department spending). There should be, Gates said, "a dramatic increase in spending on the civilian instruments of national security – diplomacy, strategic communications, foreign assistance, civic action, and economic reconstruction and development."
Leadership, Nye says, is about knowing when to use which kind of power. Going forward, he recommended that the next president-elect announce even before taking office that he or she will close the Guantanamo Bay prison and take initiatives on issues of global concern such as climate change.
Finally, Nye says Barack Obama's candidacy for president has captivated foreign publics, and has helped America's image "even if he doesn't win."

It seems to me that "smart power" is merely a slightly disguised version of dumb power. The problem here is not whether a nation prefers to use one or another kind of power to get its way, but whether building a foreign policy on getting your way regardless of the consequences is a decent and honorable policy.
It is time we began to ask the question "Can America afford to demand that all other nations act in its interest?"
We no longer have the economic or military strength to make such demands even if they were in our best interest. It seems to be we need to move beyond an assumption of unchallenged hegemony and lead the way to a more equitable and just world.
Posted by: Charles | April 24, 2008 at 06:16 PM
another way of putting it is: who shall pay the price for the comforts we demand?
We have no right, and no moral standing, to soft or hard or smart or dumb power to get what we want in this world.... and really, that underlying fact deserves more attention than how well or how poorly the USA is at throwing our weight around and visiting violence and greed on other people (under a pack of lies, of course) to get whatever it is those in power in the US think we should have.
Our military is now being used as extortion rackets for multi-national corporations.
Posted by: Susan | April 24, 2008 at 11:58 PM
is the last sentence nye's or the writer's (or both) nuanced way to endorse obama
Posted by: jamzo | April 25, 2008 at 10:27 AM
Jamzo - Thanks for the comment. It was certainly not my intention to endorse Obama, and I hope it does not read that way. (I can't speak for Joe Nye's views).
The point he was making is that there has been a lot of attention overseas to Obama's candidancy in particular, and the fact that an African-American with overseas roots can get as far as Obama has already in the presdintial contest reflects well on the United States.
Regards
Warren
Posted by: Warren Strobel | April 25, 2008 at 11:15 AM