A few weeks ago, I ran into Danny Seaman, the head of Israel’s government press office who has a well-cultivated disdain for many international journalists covering Israel.
“I hear you’re leaving,” Danny said to me. “I’d pop the champagne, but I don’t drink.”
We both laughed and then had a chat about baseball.
I’m sure Danny has used that line dozens of times over the years with many a reporter who has set up shop in Jerusalem to cover this conflict.
Danny is famous for his hostility towards journalists.
Over the years, he’s battled with reporters (calling them "idiots" and worse) and penalized media companies like Al Jazeera that he viewed as biased.
Last year, Danny defended Israel’s decision to bar journalists from entering Gaza to cover the controversial military assault and accused reporters of becoming Hamas apologists.
(As a consequence, a recent survey of press freedom around the world found Israel's ranking was in "free fall.")
Over the last five years that I’ve worked in the Middle East, though, I never had a run-in with Danny. He never called to complain about our coverage and always made sure that our work visas and temporary press cards were quickly approved.
But now Danny can pop the champagne.
This week brings an end to Checkpoint Jerusalem.
As readers will have noticed, I’m heading to Kabul, where McClatchy is in the process of opening up a full-time bureau so we can better cover Afghanistan in the years ahead.
In my stead, McClatchy will be bringing you coverage from two of the most talented reporters in Jerusalem.
First, McClatchy is expanding its joint venture with The Christian Science Monitor so that readers will be able to read the work of Ilene Prusher, one of the most thoughtful veterans in Jerusalem.
Secondly, McClatchy readers will begin seeing the work of Sheera Frenkel, who distinguished herself with her widely praised coverage for The Times of London of Israel’s Gaza offensive last winter.
But, for the first time in decades, McClatchy will no longer have a full-time bureau in Jerusalem.
In fact, McClatchy has become the last American news organization to close up shop in Beit Agron, the boxy press building that long-served as Jerusalem's media hub.
For decades, as I've written before, the fourth floor of Beit Agron was coveted real estate. Journalists waited for months and years to get space on the fourth floor.
Now the hall is deserted.
In last five years, I have watched office after office close. Newsday. The Boston Globe. The Baltimore Sun. The Toronto Star. The Chicago Tribune. And, now, McClatchy.
In troubled financial times, McClatchy has held out longer than most newspaper companies in retaining its international coverage.
Over the past four years, I've covered the Israel-Hezbollah war, Saudi sitcoms, elections in Lebanon, Obama's speech to the Muslim world, Palestinian drag queens, and Israeli politics.
But the years have largely been dominated by events in Gaza.
I took over the bureau (back then it was Knight Ridder) a few weeks before Israel pulled out of Gaza in the summer of 2005.
This blog began right before the Hamas military takeover of the Gaza Strip in June, 2007. Because Israel barred reporters from entering Gaza as the fighting intensified, I was one of the few international reporters to be inside to cover the chaos as it unfolded.
This blog devoted many posts to challenging Israel's decision to bar reporters from entering Gaza during last winter's offensive. And I was one of the many reporters to trek through the Egyptian desert to enter Gaza as Israeli forces pulled out last January.
While Danny derided reporters who ventured into Gaza to report on the fighting as a "disgrace to their profession," journalists from McClatchy, NPR, The Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, The Times of London, The Independent, The Washington Post, The New York Times and other major news outlets spent weeks trying to separate fact from fiction, reality from propaganda.
Journalists spent hours interviewing survivors and testing their credibility. Reporters dug up medical records to verify claims, conducted separate interviews with witnesses, scoured neighborhoods for information, conferred with human rights researchers working in Gaza, examined the scenes of fighting, challenged inconsistencies in stories, and sought input from the Israeli military.
McClatchy reported on allegations that Israeli soldiers shot Palestinian civilians waving white flags and used Palestinian men as human shields. McClatchy wrote about Hamas using the fighting as cover to attack its Fatah rivals and about Israel's attack on the American school in Gaza.
While the stories were vociferously challenged by the Israeli officials, the Israeli government eventually, reluctantly, agreed to look into the most inflammatory allegations.
And the United Nations has warned both Israel and Hamas that they could face war crimes charges if they don't launch serious, credible investigations of their conduct during the fighting.
The coverage that led to the UN actions was possible because so many international news outlets devoted time, money and resources to the story.
Jerusalem is still home to one of the biggest concentrations of reporters in the world. But the number of full-time journalists based in the Middle East is dwindling.
And that will make it harder for all of us to separate truth from fiction in this convoluted, politically-charged part of the world.
Checkpoint Jerusalem will soon be morphing into Checkpoint Kabul. There, as here, I hope to use the blog to report on both the substantive and the surreal.
Readers are invited to keep checking in at the new checkpoint...

my goodness you'll be missed dion.
Posted by: diaa | December 07, 2009 at 07:31 AM
Thanks, Dion!
Posted by: Bob S. | December 07, 2009 at 09:56 AM
A very good blog which is the least of the things that will be missed about you and McClatchy here!
Posted by: mishmish | December 07, 2009 at 12:32 PM
Thanks for this informative recap (as well as your years of work), and I look forward to Checkpoint Kabul. Thank you for being a model member of your profession, and a great help to those of us who aren't there to see it ourselves.
Posted by: Benjamin Hall | December 07, 2009 at 08:19 PM
Your insight and clarity in this very confused part of the world will be dearly missed. Thank you for your dedication... the people of Palestine and Israel need voices like yours. Good luck in Kabul..
Posted by: AlOraibi | December 08, 2009 at 12:36 AM
Good riddance, I always thought you were one of the biggest hacks "covering" the conflict. Take your advocacy journalism to Kabul and enjoy.
Posted by: sdfasdgfasdf | December 08, 2009 at 09:57 AM
Looking forward to the Nissenbaum take on Kabul, Pashtun perplexities, and your inbeds with the US military-- as opposed to random
IDF encounters. It's been a wild ride with you inside the
Punished Land. Best of Luck!
Posted by: Jmcgirk | December 08, 2009 at 11:10 PM
You will be missed. Be safe in Kabul.
Posted by: Gene | December 12, 2009 at 04:07 AM
Your Jerusalem Blog will be sorely missed!
Posted by: Allegra | January 12, 2010 at 10:01 AM
Dion does himself a disservice by using a wide paintbrush to cover up the details.
For example, Israel's press freedom really in "free-fall"??? Of course it isn't - any responsible journalist who follows the Israeli press knows that. Are there specific issues? Of course. Is there much difference between the censorship during Cast Lead and other western military offensives? Not much.
So Dion has a grudge against Seaman, who is known to have a short fuse when dealing with journalists who report Palestinian propaganda as facts. Good for Seaman, bad for Dion for not mentioning this.
In lambasting Seaman, Dion joins the ranks of other blind journalists who leave the region with almost nothing to say about the Palestinians. Dion was based in Jerusalem because of the press freedom there which do NOT exist in Ramallah or Gaza City - yet Dion doesn't mention this fact.
Another example: I did a search for "Martin" on Dion's blog, but only found "drinking martinis".
Hey Dion - anything to say about Paul Martin who is still being held without charge in Gaza? Why the silence about this direct attack on press freedom by the PA?
And more to the point - anything to say about why journalists keep quoting the Palestinians who say "legitimate right to resist the occupation" and nothing about the illegality of the "by any means" and the war crimes committed by Hamas over the past two decades?
Seaman is right-on when he accuses the press of being apologists for Hamas. Amnesty, HRW and even Goldstone concluded that both Hamas and Fatah have official policies of war crimes - yet the press has been silent about that while at the same time suffers verbal diarrhea when it comes to accusations about Israel.
Good luck in Kabul. Keep your head down and your pen up.
Posted by: JB | March 02, 2010 at 03:07 AM