Saraa Barhoum fidgets in her swivel chair and plays with the pink lace lining of her frilly top.
When first she speaks, her voice is barely a whisper. She can't be more than five-feet-tall or weigh 70 pounds.
Her pink bellbottoms cover her feet and drag slightly on the ground. The afternoon sun glints off the sparkly butterflies on her shirt.
She is a bashful and serious 11-year-old who wants to be a doctor when she grows up.
For now, though, she is the first Hamas television Mouseketeer.
Saraa is the young star of "Tomorrow's Pioneers," the weekly, hour long Hamas TV kids show that brought the world the militant Mickey Mouse look-alike who was beaten to death by an Israeli interrogator.
Like "The Mickey Mouse Club" show of old, "Tomorrow's Pioneers" doles out moral guidance for kids. Only the Hamas TV show takes a slightly different tack.
Kids are taught to respect their parents and be faithful to their God. They are encouraged to defend their land and fight the Jews. They are taught to conserve water because the Jews have stolen their drinking water. They are reminded of the young Palestinian children killed by the Israeli military.
Saraa wants to be a doctor. But she says she would be proud to die as a Palestinian martyr.
There's nothing quite as jarring as seeing what growing up in a war zone does to children. In the United States, Saraa might have been another Annette Funicello. Here in Gaza, she is a pint-sized revolutionary.
Political indoctrination of kids is hardly unique to Gaza. When I was half Saraa's age, my mother strapped an "I'm the price if there is no peace" placard on around my shoulders and stood me on the sidewalk during an anti-Vietnam War protest.
During another anti-war demonstration, my mom went running through the streets of Cambridge with my brother on her back as police fired tear gas at the activists.
In many ways, Saraa is nothing more than the natural byproduct of her surroundings. Saraa grew up in Rafah, the southernmost Gaza Strip town along the Egyptian border that was the scene of some of the worst fighting during Israel's 38-year occupation.
Until Israel razed its Gaza settlements and ended its military rule of Gaza in 2005, its military regularly clamped down on Rafah. Hundreds of Rafah homes were demolished during the worst clashes. The town is still a grim maze of rubble and abandoned, bullet-riddled apartment buildings.
During one clash, Saraa says, an Israeli tank fired a shell at her family as her father tried to spirit his kids to safety. Saraa and one of her brothers were both hit by shrapnel.
So it shouldn't come as a shock that kids like Saraa are militarized at a young age.
It's not common, but you sometimes see kids at political rallies toting both toy and real weapons.
After Hamas took control of Gaza in June, one father at a street corner press conference tied a green Hamas bandana around his daughter's head, dressed her in camouflage pants and placed a plastic machine gun in her hands.
This kind of thing isn't exclusive to Hamas. It's not even exclusiv
e to one side.
One of the most controversial series of photographs during last summer's war between Hezbollah and Israel, taken by Associated Press photog Sebastian Scheiner, showed young Israeli girls drawing messages on artillery shells waiting to be fired into southern Lebanon.
The full series of shots can be seen here.
Many Israelis resented the implication that their kids were being used as pawns or brought up to embrace war. One Israeli blogger, Lisa Goldman, wrote a long explanation of the photos.
"I worry about the climate of hate that would lead people to look at it and automatically assume the absolute worst - and then use the photo to dehumanize and victimize," she wrote. "I wonder why so many people seem to take satisfaction in believing that little Israeli girls with felt markers in their hands - not weapons, but felt markers - are evil, or spawned by an evil society. I wonder how those people would feel if Israelis were to look at a photo of a Palestinian child wearing a mock suicide belt in a Hamas demonstration and conclude that all Palestinians - nay, all Arabs - are evil."
Before Lebanon, the fight to prevent Israel from pulling out of Gaza in 2005 was spearheaded largely by teenage Israeli boys and girls who have been taught that the West Bank and Gaza belong to the Jews and that Palestinians have no claims to the land.
During the summer of 2005, Israeli teenagers by the hundreds descended on Gaza and had to be forcibly removed by the Israeli military.
Among the most hard core were the so-called "Hilltop Youth," a hard-core group made up of young Israelis who set up illegal settlements in the West Bank, cut down Palestinian olive groves and battle the Israeli military when they take down the renegade outposts.
Some of the most dramatic images during Israel's 2005 Gaza pullout focused on the ardent Israeli kids who barricaded themselves in settlement synagogues and fought their army wth paint, bricks and tomatoes. The biggest battle came at the Gaza Strip settlement of Kfar Darom (at right).
There are obvious differences between carrying a peace sign at a protest, putting a toy gun in your child's hands, handing your daughters magic markers to write on artillery shells, throwing paint on soldiers and starring on a television show that regularly demonizes Israelis.
These images give activists on both sides plenty of political ammunition to prove that those on the other side are raising their kids to hate. And there is certainly enough truth in such claims to continue fueling the emotional debate.

You should know better than most though that pictures/stories of Israeli children that are given Israeli flags and walk around and through Palestinian villages/neighborhoods chanting, just to intimidate or validate their superiority, don't get media coverage in the U.S. Yet often, photos of Palestinian children with guns (toy or real) are featured regularly in photos or satirical cartoons. (Everyone knows Palestinian parents strap suicide vests on their children on their 2nd birthday. It's tradition!)
Anyone interested can see pictures by going to Google Video and/or Images. Enter "Israeli children" and "guns". Or, "Settlers" and "Hebron".
For an examination of the contention on Palestinian textbooks, check out Prof. Nathan Brown's website and study at the following link:
http://www.geocities.com/nathanbrown1/Adam_Institute_Palestinian_textbooks.htm
The only time we hear even an inkling of Israeli extremism is when a settler eviction is conducted, such as recently in Hebron and even then they're portrayed as innocuous; throwing tomatoes and water on the soldiers. Alternative outlets is where you see pictures or mention of the rocks, spit, kicking or hitting.
Also, although in your blog you mention some of the factors that may explain why Palestinian grow up hardened and bitter (war zone, occupation), your McClatchy article did not. No 'occupation', no 'war zone', no mention of the number of deaths in Gaza by 'errant' Israeli shells, no latest statistic on how many Gazan children have been killed or mangled by these 'errant' Israeli shells, no mention of the restrictions, etc ...
It ended up being the same old, same old that is presented to the American public that re-confirms our perception of the Palestinians' inbred hatred of Israel for no apparent reason other than they must obviously be anti-semitic and their willingness to exploit their children for propaganda sake. (Because of course they don't love their children like we do.)
Why? Why are you willing to give context in your blog, but don't when it matters the most?
Posted by: Edie | August 14, 2007 at 11:50 AM
One problem with writing for newspapers is that we rarely get more than 800-900 words to tell a story. I'd like to think that this new blog gives me and McClatchy Newspapers a chance to more fully explain the stories we are covering. That was my goal in writing this piece. Sections of the original article that offered more background about Saraa being injured and the environment in which she grew up were cut for space.
Beyond that, however, in talking about Saraa and the show with friends and colleagues, the overwhelming reactions were disappointment, sadness and disgust. Even if there was an Israeli version of "Tomorrow's Pioneers" on Israeli TV that demonized Palestinians and taught Israeli kids that the Palestinians should be driven from the West Bank and Gaza, it wouldn't provide a solid defense for "Tomorrow's Pioneers."
Even when you explain the environment in which Saraa and the show come from, I don't think it provides a solid justification for the message the show delivers.
Posted by: Dion Nissenbaum | August 14, 2007 at 12:44 PM
Was the sadness, disapointmnet and disgust directed at the shows' producers, Saraa, the exploitation of children in general (the symptoms) or towards the situation that made the show exist in the first place (the disease)?
I agree that the current situation is sad, disapointing and disgusting. And, shameful and frustrating and scary ...
It reminds me of the argument here in the U.S. about a lot of the rap out there that uses profanity, catagorizes women as 'bitches' and talks about violence and sex all inter-mingled together. Which came first the chicken or the egg?
Is hip hop and rap just telling it like it is already? Is Saraa simply a reflection of what a 4 decade occupation can do to a community? A little girl? How many little friends has she lost or seen injured? Some areas of Gaza look like the opening scene in 'Terminator I'. Scary.
Or, are shows like the one on al quds tv serving to incite the community, not simply reflecting reality - their reality?
I don't see anyone having to push Saraa to think the way she does. She simply has to look around her neighborhood (or step outside the studio). I don't see anyone having to put stones in the childrens' hands. This is their reality. This is their life. So ... should Palestinian parents tell their kids that they're wrong to feel the way they do or to be patient and not throw stones at the jeeps since negotiations are under way? Again?
Posted by: Edie | August 14, 2007 at 03:50 PM
Sorry. Previous entry was lengthy way of saying that you stated that her environment was no justification 'for the message the show delivers'.
Well, isn't the show simply reflecting Saraa's (Gazan childrens') reality?
Posted by: Edie | August 14, 2007 at 04:07 PM
The One who separated Israel for Himself will end all conflicts in His own time.
Posted by: ubet | August 23, 2007 at 07:02 AM