« Show me your earmarks and I'll show you mine? | Main | Clinton camp splits on whether Obama can win Pennsylvania in the fall »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c64169e200e55126551b8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Future debates:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
This is a group blog by McClatchy journalists who covered the 2007-2008 presidential election campaign.
E-mail a story suggestion
More McClatchy politics coverage
McClatchy homepage
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 |
I call upon both networks to include all candidates. I am especially referring to Mike Gravel. He adds a dimension to the debate that is sorely missing. Where is the environment, where is Iraq, where is energy policy in the current debate? This country needs dialogue on those pressing matters. It also needs dialogue on torture. Are we to leave torture totally unaddressed in this presidential campaign?
Posted by: amorando | March 16, 2008 at 08:49 AM