« Pranking the Global Times: Ai Weiwei and a lesson in propaganda | Main | Of China, airports and progress: When a roof is more than just a roof »

"Let Hundreds of Schools Contend" ... Wait, what year is it?

Mao Zedong, 1956: "Let a hundred flowers bloom, let a hundred schools of thought contend"

That now infamous Mao slogan and its encouragement of freer expression led Chinese intellectuals to publicly criticize Communist Party policy. After things got a bit too close to the bone for comfort, those who'd spoken up were silenced with a harshness typical of Mao's reign. Faced with the apparent contradiction of both sparking the 100 Flowers movement and then crushing it, Mao later explained that it had all along been a ruse meant to lure bad elements out of hiding.

Few, if any, would draw parallels between 1956 and today. But an item carried by the state Xinhua news wire yesterday had language that was strikingly similar. Reporting a speech by President Hu Jintao at the Great Hall of the People, Xinhua said that: 

"In his speech, the president called on Chinese writers and artists to persist in the principles of 'Serve the People and Serve Socialism,' 'Let All Flowers Bloom Together' and 'Let Hundreds of Schools Contend.' 

He advised them to get close to the realities and lives of the masses, uphold the spiritual torch of the Chinese nationality, and produce a greater number of excellent works that live up to the history, the times and the people."

(The full text of the article, which I learned of via a Tweet by Danish correspondent and friend Kim Rathcke Jensen, can be found by clicking here.)

After recent talk at the highest levels of the Communist Party about the importance of culture, and rising political star Bo Xilai's emphasis on "red culture", the speech by Hu had a certain resonance. Of course, there are questions about how much of the current rhetoric reflects a serious ideological thrust, versus more shallow political maneuvering.

With all of this in mind, I refreshed my memory of the 100 Flowers movement by looking through a couple of history books. One of them, the Penguin History of Modern China, had a line about the crackdown that followed 100 Flowers and the reasons for it.

As much as anything else I read this evening about China's recent history and the politics of today, I thought it offered a sound explanation: "The rock of the regime -- the Party -- had to be preserved..."

 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c64169e20162fcc5e2d9970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Let Hundreds of Schools Contend" ... Wait, what year is it?:

Comments

Colleges Gold Coast

I guess China must have to give an eye on improving the standard of their education, I'm not saying they have a low quality education what I mean is that I know they can do more and there's still a room for improvement. They can go higher that the US educational standard if they wanted to.

Tom Lasseter

Hello Rogier,
Thank you for the link. I just looked over your site, which is terrific. I also used the search function for "flowers" -- you're right about the phrase being in use for all those years. Given the historical context, I would've thought it'd been shelved.
Perusing the site also gave me the opportunity to read your translation of the "Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party Decision Concerning Deepening Cultural Structural Reform."

Am always struck by how densely they pack the jargon in these sorts of documents. To your knowledge, has anyone ever diagrammed a similar doc with explanations of historical context for the various phrases? Would be fascinating to see.

In any event, thanks again for the note.
All best, Tom

Rogier Creemers

The whole Hundred Flowers thing is absolutely nothing new. It has been included in major policy documents on culture and media throughout the 80s, 90s and 2000s. I translated a number of them on my website: http://chinacopyrightandmedia.wordpress.com

Nonetheless, I fully agree with the general gist of your analysis. But maintaining Party power has been the overriding goal all along. Should we be surprised?

Rogier Creemers

The whole Hundred Flowers thing is absolutely nothing new. It has been included in major policy documents on culture and media throughout the 80s, 90s and 2000s. I translated a number of them on my website: http://chinacopyrightandmedia.wordpress.com

Nonetheless, I fully agree with the general gist of your analysis. But maintaining Party power has been the overriding goal all along. Should we be surprised?

Tom Lasseter

Hi David,

Thank you for the link and the excellent material.
I'll note that the remarks I reference in this blog piece were made by President Hu on Nov. 22.
Per Xinhua:
BEIJING, Nov. 22 (Xinhua) -- Great times call for great writers and artists, and the people expect great literary and artistic works, President Hu Jintao said Tuesday while speaking to an audience of 3,300 who represent the country's literary and art circles.

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2011-11/22/c_131263326.htm

All Best, Tom

David

This is just the October material that took them 6 weeks to translate . . . We covered the full "Decision" on culture at the Party meeting here: http://cmp.hku.hk/2011/10/26/16743/

The comments to this entry are closed.

ABOUT THIS BLOG

Tom

"China Rises" is written by Tom Lasseter, the Beijing bureau chief for McClatchy Newspapers.

Send Tom a story suggestion.

Read Tom's stories at news.mcclatchy.com.

Follow Tom on Twitter: @TomLasseter

Follow Tom on Google Plus

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

THIS MONTH

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3 4 5
    6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19
    20 21 22 23 24 25 26
    27 28 29 30 31    

Photo Albums